Caterpillar survives violent removal and moves about as if nothing happened

Walking to work is fine but what if you have to pick up hitch hikers?

After I settled in my seat, I felt something on my neck. I scratched vigorously and this caterpillar flew off and settled on the faux woodwork.

One would expect such delicate things to be crushed by such force. Nay, nothing like that happened. This plucky creatures are pretty strong. I guess garden lizards find them like we find murukku.

PHOTO-Hardy-caterpillar-survives-rough-dusting-off

Why are Jews hated all over the world?

There is a short answer and a long answer for this question. The short answer is: They hunt with the hounds and run with the hare. The criminal elite of the world (most of whom are Jews) use ordinary Lay Jews as cannon fodder against the rest of humanity. Jews are sacrificed when there is a blowback. Most often, the blowback is sponsored by the same Jewish criminal elite, for they have a freakish determination to control both sides of a conflict. Inevitably, surviving Jews nurse a strong grudge against non-Jews. And, this sequence repeats itself in an endless pitiless self-reinforcing cycle.

Let us take an example. In the Weimar Republic, rich and powerful Jews (acting on behalf of the
Rothschilds and other banking families) used their influence to financially squeeze Germany. Germany had no natural resources and was greatly dependent on exports. The German nation was then systematically impoverished by hyperinflation. German Jews, exploiting their international connections, cornered all the supply of hard currency and bought everything on the cheap.

Not only that, agents of the Rothschilds from American and European banking families covertly started financing one named Hitler and his Nazi (pronounced natzi as it is an abbreviation of National Socialism) party. (Fascism, like Communism and Socialism, was a governance model being tried out by the Rothschilds to enslave people. Big Business and their press organs expressed great admiration for it at that time, as it was a wonderful marriage of
corporate greed and political power.) As the Nazi gained influence, his distractors in the Press (again Jews) dug out information that his father was born out of wedlock and that his paternal grandfather might have been Jewish – Frankenberger, a scion of the seigneurial house of Ottenstein and Baron Rothschild of Vienna were cited as potential candidates. Hitler’s mother is thought to have conceived when she worked as a maid in the household of Baron Rothschild. In his time, German Jews used to call Hitler as the “Austrian Jew.”)

When Hitler came to power, he unleashed a rule of terror against Jews. The objective was to drive all Jews to the small Jewish colony in Palestine. This did not work out as intended. Jews living under German occupation tried to escape to other countries in Europe and America, not to Palestine. Jewish organizations successfully lobbied their governments to close their borders to fleeing Jews. The only door open was in Palestine. (Israel is a military base masquerading as a nation. Israel and several Muslim-majority countries were carved out of the Turkish empire by the British to prevent it from monopolizing Middle-East oil.) So, the theatre of war was extended to all over Europe. Jews who had escaped were caught, brought back in trains and quartered in concentration camps. (Concentration camps were invented by the Rothschilds in their conflict with the Boers (19th century Dutch settlers in Transvaal (now in South Africa). Tens of thousands, including women and children lost their lives). Jews in the concentration camps were integral part of the workforce that supplied the war effort and were reasonably looked after during most of the war.

International Jews working for the Rothschilds, who until then were financing the German war machine, made a deal to switch sides if the UK and the US agreed to let the USSR take half of Europe, the West take control of oil-rich Arab nations, and both of them establish Israel as a nation in the Turkish colony of Palestine. As agreed, General Patton was asked to cool his heels and Soviet forces were allowed to catch up and “free” many countries in Eastern Europe from
German occupation. It was doom for Germany after that. Even though Germany offered to surrender many times, the Allies refused and unleashed a bombing campaign that delayed the end of the war for as long as possible. In the final days of World War II, hundreds of thousands of inmates perished in the concentration camps from epidemics and starvation. The emaciated bodies of the Jewish inmates, dead and living, were photographed and portrayed as victims of German war crimes.

When the war ended, young and able Jews were eagerly exported to Palestine not just from Germany but also from the USSR and the countries occupied by it in Eastern Europe. Once in Palestine, Jewish terrorist gangs unleashed a war against the British forces and Palestinians. In 1948, the UN unilaterally decided to divide Palestine between Jews and Palestinians. At that time, Palestine was 67% non-Jewish (1,237,000) and 33% Jewish (608,000). Jews were offered 55% percent of the land when they owned only 7% of it. When the British mandate ended, Jews declared Israel as a sovereign nation and was recognized as such by the UN, US, and USSR. Thus, curtains were officially raised for “Arab prejudice.” Today, Israel is the biggest Jewish ghetto in the world, as the Israelis have built a wall surrounding it to keep the Palestinians out.

Decades later, stories began to be told about “a Jewish Holocaust” under Hitler wherein an astounding number of six million Jews had perished. This was astounding because there was never six million Jews under German occupation and it was unlikely that such a huge number could be killed in the poorly equipped gas chambers. No post-mortem remains were produced to back up the claim. The Holocaust figure was revised several times downwards by Holocaust “authorities” themselves but the six million number continues to be used as fact. Under Stalin, 20 million Christians were killed, starved or tortured to death. Most of Stalin’s executioners were Jews. In World War II, more than 50 million Christians died. (Rothschild’s New World Order underlings see these mass murders in positive light, calling them “mass cullings.”

Yet, people are constantly reminded of the mythical 6 million Jews who perished under Nazi rule.
After the WWII, Jews took control of Nazi concentration camps and put ethnic Germans (Christians) in them. Here thousands of German Christians were starved, tortured and killed. A Jewish reporter John Sack wrote a book An Eye for an Eye: The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge for the Holocaust. The original publisher who commissioned the book refused to print. One publisher pulped its edition. Years later, the TV program 60 Minutes and the newspaper New York Times corroborated what Sack wrote: that at the end of World War II, thousands of Jews sought revenge for the Holocaust. They set up 1,255 concentration camps for German civilians — German men, women, children and even babies were beat, whipped, tortured and murdered.

Rothschilds Are Behind Epidemics, Vaccinations, Zombie Attacks – Mass Euthanasia and Depopulation To Follow

It looks like Mad Cow deaths are being spun as “zombie” incidents (http://pastebin.com/tQpynGDX).

Unlike pasture-raised (grass-fed) cows of the developing world, cows in the West are non-vegetarian. After a cow is slaughtered and all the meat that can be sold for human consumption is taken away, a lot of the body parts still remains – heart, lungs, brains, intestines, etc. Disposing this waste is very expensive.

So, enterprising American farmers grind up this waste and feed it back to their cows. The American governments (Depart of Agriculture and Food and Drug Administration) thinks this is okay. American cows do not just eat their own kind, they eat crap too. American cows are fed on a steady diet of poultry waste. (See UTILIZATION OF POULTRY LITTER AS FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE; http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dailys/01/Nov01/110501/ts00014.doc)

As these cows are under a unnatural non-vegetarian diet in various states of decay, they are given lots of antibiotics to keep them alive. Yes, human beings who consume the beef also assimilate the antibiotics in their bodies. (Another danger that these cows pose is hormones. To increase milk supply and accelerate growth rate, farmers inject the the cows with lots of hormones. People in the West are suffering from an epidemic of obesity because they consume hormone-tainted meat. These people are also big consumers of healthcare services and hence the government does not ban cow hormones.)

Despite all the antibiotics, some diseases particularly those that are caused by viruses and prions affect the cows. Chief among them is bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), popularly known as Mad Cow Disease. BSE is caused by a special class of agents called prions. Prions are a modified form of naturally occurring harmless proteins. They can replicate themselves, even though they lack genetic material (RNA and DNA). They tend to accumulate in nervous tissue of the animals. Antibiotics are ineffective against these agents, because they like viruses barely resemble life.

Cows fed on brain, spinal cord, and other nervous tissue are susceptibel to BSE. The effect of spongiform encephalopathy is similar to rabies, where the virus accumulates in nervous tissue (which is off limits to the body’s immune system) and the infected animal/human slowly loses control over motor and non-motor functions. It is early during this period that affected human become violent. That is just a phase.

It could also be that US/British governments are testing weaponized disease-causing agents and mind-altering drugs. Once in a while, they deploy these warheads on the human population without their knowledge – in America and abroad. (William Blum; Rogue State – A Guide To The World’s Only Superpower;)

Biological terrorism on US civilians by US military and CIA from the book Rogue State

A good number of companies, owned directly or indirectly by Rothschilds, exploit the epidemics caused by these attacks to sell vaccines and drugs. The ultimate goal is of course global depopulation.

These epidemics will acquire global proportions and wipe out a significant part of the world population. Fears of zombies apocalypse will be blown out of proportion and governments will take it upon themselves to eliminate a good number of survivors. Laws empowering governments are already in place. If anyone thinks that existing laws will not permit such abuse should start reading the papers. World over, governments are upgrading graves for handling mass fatalities (See Michel Chossudovsky; Planning the H1N1 Flu Pandemic: Body Bags, Mass Graves, Quarantine Orders Selected Evidence; http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=15307&context=va; 20 September 2009 and Wales Online; Mass graves plan if pandemic hits Wales; http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/08/16/welsh-assembly-government-report-considers-mass-graves-in-the-event-of-a-flu-pandemic-91466-27069389/; 16 August 2010)

Many countries already have laws legitimizing euthanasia. In the case of pandemics, these laws will be combined emergency powers and will be used to kill people. Medical “ethicists” are floating trial balloons to legitimize murder of babies after they are born – calling it “post-birth abortions.” (See Daily Moral Volcano; Post-Birth Abortion Debate: A Precursor To Mass Culling of Human Population; https://moralvolcano.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/rothschilds-depopulation-agents-float-legal-infanticide-balloon/; 4 April 2012)

Crowd-sourcing techniques will be deployed. Citizens will be encouraged to form local vigilante groups to kill zombies. Online services such as Facebook and Twitter will do yeoman services in spotting zombies and eliminating them. You think this is just fancy talk? The American agents of the Rothschilds, that is the Rockefellers, have published a paper where they have come up with just this scenario. (Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
Imagining the Future; The Rockefeller Foundation and The Global Business Network; May 25, 2010;) Credit goes to Texe Marrs for bring attention to this fiendish work of the Rothschilds. (Down the Rabbit Hole (Volume 8) — Immoral Lizards, Israeli Puppets, Vicious Warmongers, Treasonous Spies, and Other Political Misfits; 10 February, 2012) The paper identifies that China, with its authoritarian powers, is more successful in containing the pandemic than the supposedly liberal United States.

2012 Pandemic Scenario Imagined By Rockefeller Foundation

In a paper titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development: Imagining the Future”, the Rockefeller Foundation imagines a scenario in which 20% of the population is wiped out by a global epidemic.

With the remaining population, World Government will be formed. Pandemics are just one of several ways that the Rothschilds are trying to impose their world government. The collapse of the US dollar or the Euro, if not properly handled, can cause a similar effect, although it may be a bit prolonged.

This is similar to the World War I, which was triggered by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. Plots to murder him were one of several incidents that were designed to trigger a World War. In the decades earlier, the Rothschilds had put in place several interlocking agreements that ensured that major European powers were quickly sucked into any minor conflict. Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination was one of several projects that went ahead first and was most successful in triggering the world war.

So, it is either a global financial collapse or a global pandemic leading to a zombie apocalypse.

Why Not A Chargesheet Against Manmohan Singh?

After the “coalgate” exposes, there have been few calls for booking a case against the PM Manmohan Singh. (Mammohan Singh was running the coal portfolio when those allotments were made to private players.) In Team Anna, Arvind Kejrival has been forthright that Singh should be investigated.

This is in stark contrast with the stand adopted by Subramanian Swamy and Baba Ramdev. Both have them are saying that no allegations should be made against Singh directly. CBI has also refused to investigate Singh’s acts of commission and ommission, despite prodding from the Central Vigilance Commission.

Why is everyone avoiding a direct confrontation with Singh? The reason why Subramaniam Swamy avoids allegations against the Singh may be tactical. If Singh is himself gets accused corruption, then he will simply deny the allegations and refuse to take any action. But, if accusations are made against his cabinet colleagues, then he at least can put on a charade of taking action. The other big reason is that if accusations are directed at Singh, then the PM will send the Intelligence Bureau (IB) against the accusers. Although the IB is an organization with no legal status, it runs the country because the Rothschilds order Indian Prime Ministers to listen to it.

Baba Ramdev in his previous dharna made allegations against the PM. The PM, on the advise of the IB, sent police goons to chase and mercilessly attack his supporters at the dharna. Baba Ramdev is wiser by experience. Swamy is even wiser thanks to his decades of public life.

Now, what allegations can be made against Singh so that he will go to jail? Before that, let me settle that the CBI stand that it cannot investigate “policy decisions” taken by Singh is untenable. You cannot make a policy decision to enrich undeserving private parties. Raja is in jail because he deliberately change the rules to favour certain companies. Singh took away coal blocks from Coal India and gave them to private parties at throwaway rates without competitive bidding and without ascertaining if they had the wherewithal to properly exploit the blocks. Now, back to our list.

  1. Giving Coal India’s coal blocks to unqualified private parties at throwaway rates.
  2. Writing numerous letters to and forcing ONGC to give natural gas supply to TR Baalu’s companies at below-market rates.
  3. Claiming shortage of domestic uranium supply and then signing expensive deals with foreign suppliers of nuclear reactors instead of fuel.
  4. Unfreezing Quatrocci bank account so that he could take away his bribe money.

This is for starters. There many other allegations that can be Singh can be prosecuted for. I just don’t have time. It is unlikely that the BJP will be interested in all this. They are hand in hand with the Congress and the Leftist parties in creating a charade. They all make a big fuss and forget about it afterwards. (Recently a Calcutta HC judge was subject to an elaborate charade to give the impression of cleaning the judicial stables of corruption.)

Take Arun Jaitely of the BJP. He is at the forefront of the BJP attack against the government in Parliament. He should be the last person to follow up these allegations to its logical conclusion. Why?

Just read the Chitra Subramaniam’s account in the Outlook magazine (Smoking Guns: Eating Out Of A Foreign Hand; May 7, 2012; Outlook).

An election was lost on the inability of one of our most respected and admired prime ministers to tell us why Quattrocchi was paid. The proverb ‘the way to hell is paved with good intentions’ partly describes what the V.P. Singh government did to the Bofors investigations. First he announced he would “catch the thieves” in 14 days, while all of us in Switzerland and Sweden wondered if he had some clinching evidence. Mani Shankar Aiyar’s latest assault on the Indian investigating team is not entirely incorrect, whatever his political compulsions are. I know he did good work in Mayiladuthurai and then lost the election.

The first Letter Rogatory (LR)—a legal document countries exchange before the start of international assistance in criminal matters—was a museum piece. I had assisted the Indian government in securing the services of Marc Bonnant, one of the world’s best brains in matters of international criminal assistance. He was embarrassed to tell me that the LR filed by us would be thrown out not because of substance, but because there were rubber stamps all over the evidence, with numerous signatures making every page illegible, therefore not acceptable in a court of law. Some pages were stapled all around, as if we were hiding something, and everything was bound together in a fat file with unbreakable thread. Snowman, my Swiss source, asked if cutting the unbreakable thread had any legal consequences.

That LR was thrown out, the guilty claimed victory and in the following months the government fell, but not before they had planted stories in New Delhi—the city of gossip—Switzerland and Sweden. When you treat cancer, the first diagnosis has to be accurate. If your doctor gets that wrong, you are in serious trouble. Many Indian politicians carelessly compare cancer to our political system without realising they are part of it.

Here is Iyer’s followup account (‘B’ For Bofors, ‘N’ For Nobody?; 28 May 2012; Outlook):

When Rajiv Gandhi was soundly beaten in the elections of November 1989, why would he demand in the Lok Sabha that the incoming prime minister place on the table of the House every single paper dealing with Bofors so that the country could see whether the new Leader of the Opposition was a crook or not? Why would a guilty party demand that the evidence against him be made public? Only because he was not guilty.

V.P. Singh reneged on his promise to place all the Bofors papers on the table and submitted only the choice few he deemed fit to prove his outrageous claim, made during the elections, that the piece of paper he pulled out of his pocket contained the details of the relevant bank accounts and the guilty would be brought to book within weeks of his winning the election. A critical noting in the files tabled showed that on the very day the Swedish National Accounting Bureau confirmed that illegal payments had indeed been made (my memory is the date was June 4, 1987), the prime minister was raising on file all the relevant questions: whether a military assessment had been made about the security implications of indefinitely postponing procurement of a gun the army had hitherto held critical to the defence of the nation; whether an alternative gun of the same quality, with “shoot and scoot” capability, could be procured within a reasonable period of time and, if so, at what estimated extra cost; whether cancelling the Bofors contract would stand the scrutiny of the International Court of Arbitration; what effect such cancellation would have on other commercial contracts; and so on and so forth.

But, alas, without the prime minister knowing, his additional secretary, the very powerful bureaucrat, Gopi Arora, decided to suppress the file. Not till Arun Singh, the minister of state for defence, resigned at the end of the following month did the prime minister’s pertinent questions reach the ministry. This is evident from the notings that show that although Rajiv penned his questions in his own hand and signed the file in early June, it was received in the defence ministry only at the end of July.

Many years later, I asked Gopi, who was a friend and colleague of mine at the PMO, why he did this. His reply was that he was hoping to heal the rift between the two erstwhile friends, Rajiv and Arun Singh, which he thought would be irretrievably damaged if the file went forward. The moot point is that not one shred of evidence indicating any wrongdoing was revealed in the papers made public by prime minister V.P. Singh. Deservedly, he fell within a year, but not before his additional solicitor general, one Arun Jaitley, chasing the Bofors chimera between Delhi, Stockholm and Geneva, had disgraced the fair name of our nation with his shameful letters rogatory, as testified to by Lindstrom, who is so quoted as saying in Chitra’s column.

Politics is a just shouting match. Somebody wins and they get to set in the throne. Ultimately, it is the power behind the throne, that is the Rothschilds, who are going to be of consequence. This is why when Narasimha Rao was PM, the BJP opposed the Enron project. When BJP came to power afterwards for just 13 days, Atal Behari Vajpayee found just enough time to pass the project (with sovereign guarantees – guaranteed profits irrespective of market conditions).

John Sack’s An Eye For An Eye

You might have heard of concentration camps that the Germans ran for the Jews. But, have you heard about the 1255 concentration camps that the Jews ran for ethnic Christian Germans AFTER THE SECOND WORLD WAR? Did you know that 60,000 to 80,000 thousand Germans died in those camps? Did you know that the German government refused to investigate these crimes? Did you know that when John Sack, a well-known Jewish reporter, decided to write a book about these camps, no publisher in the “Free World” would dare to publish it? Did you know that one publisher printed it and pulped the entire edition? This is his account in his own words. (You can read the book online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/89657197/An-Eye-for-an-Eye-by-John-Sack-PDF

Writing Lola’s Story

Now, this story I liked. If it was true, this was a story worth telling. I had this dream: maybe the Serbs and Croats will read it, the Irish Catholics and Protestants will read it, the Hutus and Tutsis, the Israelis and Palestinians … Maybe they’ll read it, and maybe they’ll learn, as Lola did, that to hate your neighbors may or may not destroy them, but it does destroy yourself. And maybe these people will stop their revenge, stop their genocide.

We Jews always say of the Holocaust, “Never again. Never again will people hurt us simply because we are Jews.” But Lola was apparently saying, “Yes, and never again will I hurt a German simply because he’s a German.” Fifty years ago, Lola was apparently saying, “Let there be peace on earth, and let it begin with me.” This story I wanted very much to write. So …

I start interviewing Lola. At the Inn of the Seventh Ray in Los Angeles. At a Jewish cemetery in New Jersey. On the Champs Elysés in Paris. I interview Lola on and off for two-and-a-half years. Her memories just pour out, and she also introduces me to a dozen other people, all Jews: people who knew her in Gleiwitz, prison guards in Gleiwitz, even the man who appointed her the commandant in Gleiwitz.

I write a twenty-page article on Lola’s revenge and Lola’s redemption. Lola reads it and likes it. The story runs in California magazine. Lola, at her own expense, comes to Washington to promote it on National Public Radio. The story is sold internationally, and it’s reprinted in Best Magazine Articles, 1988. We have movie offers. Bette Midler and Suzanne Somers want to play the Lola part.

And then I write a book proposal. I write, “It’s Lola’s redemption, not Lola’s revenge, that this book’s about.” I’ll go to Germany. I’ll find some prisoners maybe. I’ll go to Poland. I’ll find some more guards, maybe. I’ll write a book. The title will be Lola. And in August 1988, the publisher Henry Holt in New York City says, “Okay! We want it!” Good news, and I phone it to Lola.

And Lola on the telephone says, “Listen, John, I don’t want you to write it.” I say, “Lola? Lola, this is the first time you’ve told that to me.” I say, “Lola, we signed a contract.” We had signed one. Lola had written, “I grant you the exclusive right to write and to publish a book about my life.”

That night I go to Lola’s apartment in Hollywood. Anyone here ever been in an encounter group? Remember your first night? Everyone shouting and screaming. You’re just sitting there stupefied. You’re thinking, “What is going on?” Well, I’m in Lola’s condo. Lola is saying, “Lookit, John. I don’t like the way you write. You write like a reporter. If you start writing this book, I will stop you. I will stop you!”

Lola’s daughter is there. She’s saying, “John, give it up. I’m begging you to give it up. John! Give it up!” Another daughter of Lola’s is there. She’s a lawyer, and she says, “John! You’re going to have instantaneous and very expensive litigation!” Lola’s saying, “I’ll go to court.” The daughter’s saying, “John, I want you to sign this release. John! Sign the release!” The other daughter’s saying, “John! Just leave us! Just go!” Lola’s saying, “John! Get out of our lives!”

I leave. I telephone Lola but she doesn’t answer. I write her, but she sends the letters back, unopened, inscribed “refused.”

And not just Lola. Lola’s second-in-command at the prison in Gleiwitz was Moshe, also a Jew. He won’t talk to me. His wife on the telephone says, “We don’t give you the permission to write this.” I say, “I … You …” That’s what I say, “I … You … One doesn’t need permission!” I have permission, from the Constitution of the United States. Moshe’s wife hangs up.

And then there is Jadzia, also a Jew, she was one of Lola’s guards in Gleiwitz. Jadzia says on the telephone, “I was never in Gleiwitz!” Then she says, “Yes, I was in Gleiwitz, but I’ll never talk about it!” And then she talks for an hour saying, “I don’t know nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. Nothing! Nothing!”

People won’t talk to me. People tell other people, “Don’t talk to John Sack.” People talk to me, and they lie to me. People say they’ll sue me, they’ll destroy me, they’ll kill me. One man takes my driver’s license, writes down my address, and says, “If you write about me, I will call the Israeli Mafia.”

Here’s some advice. Never tell a reporter, “You’d better not write this.” I have a contract with Henry Holt. I’ve made a promise to Henry Holt. I keep my promises.

In April 1989, I fly to Germany. I go to this castle, this concrete castle, high on a hill above the Rhine. It’s the German Federal Archives, and they’ve got forty thousand statements there by Germans who lived in what now is Poland during World War II. The statements of course are in German, in German script, and I find five statements from Germans who were in Lola’s prison.

I go to another place in Germany: a great medieval hall, with banners on the stone walls. It’s a reunion of a thousand people from Gleiwitz. They’re drinking beer. They’re eating sausages and sauerkraut. They’re laughing and singing, “Ein prosit, ein prosit …” And I’m like a little flower girl. You know, the girl who goes from table to table selling roses? I’m going around asking, “Uh, excuse me. Anyone here who was in prison in Gleiwitz?” Yeah, I am a party pooper. I admit it. But eventually I find five of Lola’s prisoners.

I take the train to Gleiwitz. Now it’s Gliwice, Poland. And going through Communist East Berlin, I’m arrested, taken off the train, and locked up in a little room because with me I have a copy of the book Die Vertreibung der deutschen Bevìkerung aus den Gebieten ótlich der Oder-Neisse [“The Expulsion of the German Population from the Territories East of the Oder-Neisse,” published in the 1950s by the Bonn government]. Hours later I’m let out and I get to Gleiwitz/ Gliwice at four in the morning. It’s a city of two hundred thousand people, almost none of whom speak English. I don’t speak Polish, but I find three of Lola’s guards. They remember her well.

It’s 1989, Poland is still Communist, but I get into Lola’s prison, into the prisoners’ cells. I tell them, “Djien dobre. Good morning.” I see the prison records. Remember when, according to Lola, she went to the Polish government and said, “I want revenge”? Well, I find her application, in her own handwriting. She wrote, “I want to cooperate against our German oppressors.” I find the official document appointing her commandant in Gleiwitz.

After that, I go to Germany eleven more times, to Poland three more times, to France, Austria, Israel, Canada, and all around the United States. Through interpreters I talk to two hundred people in Polish and Russian, Danish and Swedish, German and Dutch, French and Spanish, Yiddish and Hebrew. I left out English. I get three hundred hours of tape-recorded interviews, and I see thousands of documents.

And what do I learn? Well: Lola was telling the truth. She was the commandant in Gleiwitz. And she was taking revenge. She slapped the Germans around. And just as she said, she stopped. I remember one day in 1989, I’m having lunch with one of her guards at the Hotel Leszny. We’re eating wienerschnitzel. And out of the blue the man says, “You know, Lola stopped. She told us, ‘Stop!’ She said, ‘We’re going to show the Germans we’re not like them.'”

So Lola was telling the truth. But, she wasn’t telling the whole truth. Lola had told me the people in her prison were German soldiers. And yes, twenty of them were German soldiers, men who worked as painters, carpenters, and such. But there were a thousand other prisoners there, and they were German civilians: German men, German women, German children.

One prisoner was a fourteen-year-old boy. He had been out in Gleiwitz wearing his boy scout pants. A man cried out, “You’re wearing black pants! You’re a fascist!,” and he chased the boy and tackled him at the Church of Saint Peter and Paul, and then took him to Lola’s prison. Now, the boy was completely innocent. So were most of the people in Lola’s prison. They weren’t Gestapo. They weren’t SS. They weren’t even Nazis. Out of a thousand prisoners, just twenty were ever even accused of it.

But the Germans in Lola’s prison were slapped and whipped. And I’m so sorry to have to say it, but they were also tortured. The boy scout: the guards poured gasoline on his curly black hair and set it on fire. The boy went insane. The men: they were beaten with a Totschläger, a “beater-to-death.” It’s a long steel spring with a big lead ball at the end. You use it like a racketball racket. Your arm, your wrist, the spring: they deliver a triple hit to a German’s f ace.

Lola didn’t tell me, but the Germans in her prison were dying. I found their death certificates in Gleiwitz city hall. One of Lola’s guards told me, “Yeah, the Germans would die.” He told me, “I’d put the bodies in a horse-drawn cart. I’d cover them with potato peels so no one would see. I’d ride to the outskirts and, after I threw the potato peels out, I’d take the Germans to the Catholic cemetery. To the mass grave.”

We all know about Auschwitz. But I have to tell you, the Germans in Lola’s prison were worse off than Lola had been at Auschwitz. Lola at Auschwitz wasn’t locked in a room night and day. She wasn’t tortured night after night. She herself told me: “Thank God, nobody tried to rape us. The Germans weren’t allowed to.” But all of that happened to German girls at Lola’s prison in Gleiwitz.

One woman I talked with wasn’t even German. She was Polish. In 1945 she was twenty years old: a tall, blonde, beautiful medical student. The guards at Lola’s prison pulled off her clothes and told her, “Let’s do it!” They beat her and beat her, night after night, until she was black and blue. One morning, she came back to her cell and fell on the floor, sobbing. Her cellmate asked her, “What, what is that blue thing you’re wearing? Oh, oh, it’s your skin.”

And ten feet away was Lola’s office. Lola in her brass, braid, and stars. I once asked her, “Lola, where did you get that uniform?,” and Lola said, “Well, the Russians must’ve given it to me.” That wasn’t the whole truth either.

Lola was in the Polish secret police. Its name was the Office of State Security, in Polish the Urzad Bezpieczenstwa Publicznego. The Germans called it the Polish Gestapo. One of its missions was to round up Nazi suspects. But for all practical purposes, if you were a German, you were a Nazi suspect. So the mission was to round up Germans, imprison them, interrogate them, and if they confess, prosecute them.

In the Office of State Security, the lower ranks were Polish Catholics, but most of the leaders were Polish Jews. The chief of the Office in Warsaw was a Jew. (When I was in Poland he wasn’t alive, but I met some of his family.) The department directors, all or almost all of them, were Jews.

In Silesia, the province where Lola was commandant, the director of the Office of State Security was a Jew. I met him in Copenhagen, a little bald-headed man. The director of prisons was also a Jew. I met his whole family in Tel Aviv. The secretary of state security was a Jew. I met him time and again at his home in New Jersey. And in the Office of State Security in Silesia in February 1945, of the officers – not the enlisted men, not the guards, but the lieutenants, captains and such – one-fourth were Catholics, and three-fourths were Jews.

I interviewed twenty-four of them. And I learned that the Office of State Security ran 227 prisons for German civilians like Lola’s. It also ran 1,255 concentration camps, and I interviewed four of the commandants. They were also Jews. One was Lola’s boy friend, a man who’d lost in the Holocaust his mother, his father, all his brothers (he had no sisters), all his uncles and aunts, and all but one of his cousins. I hope that, like me, you can all have compassion for Solomon Morel.

But one night in February, 1945, Solomon went to his concentration camp in the city of Swietochlowice. He went into the Germans’ barracks, and said, “My name is Captain Morel. I am a Jew. I was at Auschwitz. I swore I would take revenge on you Nazis.” They weren’t Nazis, but Solomon said, “Now! Everyone! Sing the Horst Wessel song!” That was a Nazi anthem. No one wanted to sing it. One boy, fourteen years old, didn’t even know it.

Solomon had a club. He said, “Sing it!” Some people began, “Die Fahne hoch! Die Reihen fest geschlossen …” “Sing it! Sing it, I say!” They started singing, “Clear the streets for the brown battalions. Clear the street for the Storm Section men.” Solomon had all this hate inside him, and he released it. He picked up a wooden stool and he started beating the Germans to death. For this one camp, I found the death certificates for 1,583 Germans.

In other camps and other prisons, thousands of German civilians died. German men, women, children, babies. At one camp there was a barracks for fifty babies. They were in cribs, but the camp doctor, Dr. Cedrowski – he was a Jew who had been in Auschwitz — he didn’t heat the barracks, and he didn’t give the babies milk. He gave them only some soup, and forty-eight of the fifty babies died.

All in all, sixty to eighty thousand Germans died. Some were killed by Jews, some by Catholics, and many by typhus, dysentery, and starvation, but sixty to eighty thousand died in the custody of the Office of State Security. Now, someone, a German, once told me that this was another holocaust. Well, I’m sure it seemed like a holocaust to the Germans.

But let’s not forget: sixty thousand is one percent of the number of Jews who died in the capital-H Holocaust. Jews didn’t do what the Germans did. We didn’t plot to exterminate the German people. We didn’t mobilize all the Jews and the Jewish state. (There was no Jewish state.) We didn’t send the Germans systematically to cyanide chambers.

But let’s also remember that sixty to eighty thousand civilians is more than the Germans lost at Dresden, and more than, or just as many as, the Japanese lost at Hiroshima, the Americans at Pearl Harbor, the British in the Battle of Britain, or the Jews at Belsen or Buchenwald.

All this was covered up for nearly fifty years. Jews who were involved didn’t talk about it. For example, the chief of police in occupied Breslau, Germany, in 1945, who was Jewish, later wrote a book about the Holocaust. And in telling about his time as chief of police in Breslau, all he says is, “We moved westward to Breslau and … from there … to Prague.” That’s it. And Jewish reporters who knew didn’t write about it. There’s a working reporter right now in New York City who was in Poland right after World War II. He told me, “Whatever, whatever the Germans tell you, believe me, it’s true.” But he himself, he never wrote about it.

The truth was covered up, and was still being covered up. In 1989, I went to Yad Vashem in Jerusalem, Israel’s central Holocaust center. As you may know, they have fifty million documents there about the Holocaust. I ask them, “Well, what do you have on the Office of State Security?” They have nothing. I ask them, “What do you have on the Jews in the Office of State Security?” Nothing. I say, “Well, there were Jewish commandants, Jewish directors, Jewish …” The chairman of Yad Vashem responds, “It sounds rather imaginary,” and the director of archives says to me, “Imm-possible! Impossible!”

Denial, denial. I know that denial is a very human thing. But historically I don’t think it’s a Jewish thing. When Abraham, Isaac and Jacob committed sins, we Jews didn’t deny it. Yes, Abraham, the father of our people, sinned. God told him to go to Israel, instead he went to Egypt, and we admitted it in the Book of Genesis. Judah (the word “Jew” comes from Judah) made love to a prostitute. We admitted it in Genesis. Moses, even Moses sinned, and God didn’t let him into the Promised Land. We admitted that in Deuteronomy. Solomon — good, wise, old King Solomon — did evil. He “worshipped idols.” We didn’t cover it up. We admitted it in the Book of Kings.

It seems to me that that’s the Jewish tradition. How can we say to other people — to Germans, to Serbs, to Hutus — “What you’re doing is wrong,” if we ourselves do it and cover it up? I wish it were someone else who was here today. Abraham Foxman. Elie Wiesel. I wish he or she would simply say yes, some Jews, some Jews, did evil in 1945. But when the Jewish establishment didn’t say it, then I had to say it.

I’m a reporter. That’s what reporters do. Someone kills sixty thousand people, we report it. If we don’t report it, it might become common, or more common, than it already is. But also I’m a Jew, and the Torah says (Leviticus 5:1), that if someone does evil, and if I know it and don’t report it, then I am guilty too.

So I start writing this book. The title now won’t be Lola. It’ll be An Eye For An Eye. And on the third page I write, “I hope that An Eye For An Eyeis something more than the story of Jewish revenge: that it’s the story of Jewish redemption.” I write about Jews taking revenge, yes. But that is one tenth of An Eye for an Eye. Mostly I write …

I write about Zlata, Moshe, Mania, and Pola. They were Jews who refused to look at, much less work at Lola’s prison. I write about Ada, who visited the prison once, just once, and then fled to Israel. I write about Shlomo, who was in the Office of State Security and, at the risk of his life, told people in it, “You must stop doing this.”

I write about Lola. I write that in Gleiwitz she finally remembered how a Jew should act and, at the risk of her life, she got bread, her own bread from her own home, and smuggled it to the German prisoners. Now this isn’t something that Lola told me. No, the prison guards told me. They said that if Lola had been caught, she’d have gone to prison herself.

And I write that at Yom Kippur, 1945, Lola — again at the risk of her life — escaped from Gleiwitz, just as she had escaped some months earlier from Auschwitz, and came to the United States. Almost all the Jews in the Office of State Security escaped, at the risk of their lives, in September, October, and November 1945. And I write that too. They crept through the woods into Germany, or climbed the pass into Italy. They did what the SS never did: they deserted, they defected.

I was crying while I was writing this. My advance from Henry Holt was $25,000, and for three years I was writing An Eye For An Eye. In September 1991 I finally finished it, wrapped it up, and mailed it to Henry Holt in New York. And I told myself: “Okay. I’ve done it. That’s the end of the cover-up.”

No. Because then the people at Henry Holt say, “We don’t want it.” They don’t say it’s wrong. They know it’s right. They just say, “We don’t want to publish it. Keep the twenty-five thousand.” Okay. My agent and I send the manuscript to other publishers: to Harper’s, to Scribner’s – you name it, we sent it – to two dozen other publishers.

And let me tell you. The letters we get from these people, they’re practically blurbs. The publishers say: “well-written,” “extremely well-written,” “chilling,” “compelling,” “disturbing,” “dismaying,” “shocking,” “startling,” “astonishing,” “mesmerizing,” “extraordinary,” “I was riveted,” “I was bowled over,” “I love it!” And the publishers all reject it. The letter from St. Martin’s Press says, “I am always moved by Holocaust books, but I’d have trouble distinguishing this book … from other books … in this vast area of literature.”

Okay. My agent and I agree that if we can’t sell a book, we’ll try magazines. One of the chapters is on Solomon Morel. Remember? The man who lost his mother, father, all his siblings, uncles, and aunts in the Holocaust. The man who had so much hate for the Germans, he had to disgorge it, who commanded a concentration camp at Swietochlowice, and beat Germans to death.

Solomon is still alive. He’s wanted by Interpol for crimes against humanity. Interpol has an international warrant out for his arrest. But he’s fled to Israel. He’s taking refuge in Tel Aviv, and no one in America — no newspaper, magazine or television network — has ever reported it.

So we send the chapter on Solomon Morel to Esquire magazine. I’ve been a contributing editor there, a war correspondent in Vietnam, Iraq, Bosnia. Esquire says, “No.” We send it to GQ magazine. GQ says, “Yes!” The editor says it’s the most important story in GQ’s history. He even tells that to an editor of Esquire at a bar in Greenwich Village. He tells him, “Ha, ha! You don’t have it! We do!”

For six weeks GQ is fact-checking. They don’t find a single error. They send me the galley proofs, the page proofs, and on Wednesday the presses will roll. And then the telephone rings at my home in the Rocky Mountains. The editor of GQ says, “John, this isn’t a happy phone call. We aren’t going to run it.” He tells me to keep the $15,000 and to sell the story somewhere else.

So once again my agent and I are making calls, sending faxes, passing out the GQ page proofs. Harper’s magazine says no. Rolling Stone says no and “I’m sure you’ll understand.” Mother Jones, that great exposé magazine (“Extra! Extra! Cigarettes are bad for you!”) doesn’t even call back. The New Yorker (which has published ten pieces by me) refuses even to look at it.

But finally, finally, in March 1993, the story of Solomon Morel is published in the Village Voice. And in November,An Eye For An Eyeis published by Basic Books, a division of HarperCollins. So, thank God, now it’s all over. I can relax now. Not.

Because one day later there’s a telephone call to Basic Books. It’s from the executive director of the World Jewish Congress. He says he wants an immediate retraction, and if he doesn’t get it he’ll call a major press conference tomorrow. He says he’ll denounce me, Basic Books, and HarperCollins, and say, “They are all anti-Semites.” Well, we don’t retract, and the World Jewish Congress doesn’t denounce. But …

Then the reviews come out. And the reviewers say that An Eye for an Eye isn’t true, that what I wrote there never happened at all.

Please! Much ofAn Eye For An Eyehad been fact-checked by California magazine, fact-checked by GQ, and, for the Village Voice, fact-checked by a woman who is the Fact-Checker from Hell. She and I checked every single word, even if we had to call up Poland. And when, after two weeks of this, night and day, we were finally done, the editor of the Voice gave an interview saying, “This may be the most accurate story in the history of American journalism.”

Much ofAn Eye For An Eyewas corroborated by 60 Minutes, which found eight eyewitnesses I hadn’t found. It was corroborated by the New York Times and the International Herald Tribune. Historians hired by major newspapers in Germany went to the German Federal Archives and wrote, “The facts are true,” “The facts are right,” “The facts are iron-bound.”

But in the United States, one review was entitled “False Witness.” Another was headed “The Big Lie, Continued.”

The Jewish paper Forward said, “Sack is transparently writing docudrama,” and told readers that Lola Potok was not the commandant of the prison in Gleiwitz. Well, Lola herself had told me, “I was the commandant,” and thirty-five other people, including the current commandant, including the current director of prisons, said yes, Lola was the commandant. I have the document that says, “We appoint Citizen Lola Potok Commandant,” and I have a document signed by Lola Potok, Commandant. But still the Forward said, “The unlikelihood is overwhelming but Sack … seems … oblivious.” As I read this, I felt I was being lectured by Chico Marx. Remember? “Who you gonna believe? Your own two eyes or me?” I wrote a letter to the Forward. Over the last seven years, I’ve had to write, at last count, about 1,500 letters about An Eye for an Eye. And all those letters, added up, are twice as long as the book is.

HMS Ocean Is A Goner

An aircraft carrier avoids being a huge and expensive sitting duck by keeping its location secret and making it impossible to approach its vicinity for miles. A huge zone surrounding the carrier is off limits for any craft, big or small, hostile or friendly. The carrier and its fleet is protected round the clock by radar, sonar, and satellite surveillance. Intruders are stopped dead in their tracks by an array of fighter aircraft, helicopters, submarines, smaller battleships, missiles and guns. Carrier fleets warn approaching ships and aircraft by radio to change course so they do not get attacked. This is how carrier fleets are supposed to operate.

While fleet personnel are expected to maintain a constant vigil, they sometimes get distracted and fail to give warnings. Such lapses are exploited by air forces of rival nations who send a few jets to fly over the embarrassed fleet. In peace time, no warnings means no right to attack. Overflights are extremely embarrassing because they reveal kinks in their preparedness. Once in a while, the Russian jets do this to American and NATO fleets.

Moral Volcano readers are supposed to be better informed. Now, what do you think about the UK government who in their infinite wisdom have sent an aircraft carrier inland into the Thames river and berthed it in the middle of London? The carrier is now within range of shoulder-fired missiles and high-powered rifles. The carrier is now what it is not supposed to be – a sitting duck. Terrorists may not be able to damage or sink the carrier but if they hit something or someone, it will still be a great propaganda coup. For the Royal Navy and the UK government, it will be a publicity stunt gone horribly wrong.

Poor 2-Year-Old Karnataka Girl Loses Arm To Vaccine Mania

Doctors in private and public hospitals are under great pressure to move stocks of vaccines. While there is no money to buy medicines or maintain hygiene at many hospitals, there is plenty of money for vaccines. Anyone visiting a hospital these days will get a pitch for a vaccine. If you try to get a stitch for a cut, they will give you a anti-tetanus vaccine. All woman and girls are urged to take HPV vaccines. As for children, there is no limit. In all cases, the vaccines are given without any tests for adverse reactions.

In yesterday’s Times of India, there is a report of a poor girl who lost her hand to gangrene, caused by an adverse reaction to the Japanese Encephalitis vaccine. The parents of the girl had gone to the doctor with the original complaint of just mild fever and fatigue.

Poor 2-year-old Karnataka girl loses arm to JE vaccine

Poor 2-year-old Karnataka girl loses arm to JE vaccine

Curiously, the main online copy of the article makes no mention of the vaccines at all.

Freemasons Seek Photo, Fingerprints, DNA profile of children in Police Database

Throughout history, Freemasons have been accused of conducting bizzare satanic rituals on kidnapped children and later killing them. They have also been obsessed with the New World Order objective of putting everyone in a database.

In a prime example of putting the hen house in charge of the fox, the police in an American town, working in collaboration with a Freemasons lodge, is asking parents to get their kids photographed, fingerprinted, and cheek-swabbed (for DNA).

The “Masonic Youth Child Identification Program (MYCHIP)” plays on parents’ fears to populate their database of vulnerable children. Inevitably, you will also find the “better to be safe than sorry” argument in the story.

http://wilmington.patch.com/articles/what-would-you-do-if-your-child-was-missing

Real Origins Of Baphomet

Most people are not aware of secret societies such as Freemasonry. But, those who have, may have come across the Baphomet. Leo Taxil as part of his expose on Freemasonry (later retracted as a hoax) identified Baphomet as a deity worshipped by Freemasons. From that time, there have been many theories about the origin of this goat-headed symbol of Satan. I think these Freemason fools lifted the idea off the Indian god Lord Hayagriva. It is quite typical of these bastards. Even the name Baphomet seems like a crude pun on the archaic Western name for the Islamic prophet – Mahomet.

.Baphomet and Indian god Lord Hayagriva

Lizard TV

Hillary Clinton Plastic Surgery – Before and After

In America, young women are asked to look at their Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a role model. Hopefully, they will not look at old photos of Ms. Clinton and choose unnecessary plastic surgery.

PHOTOS_Hillary_Clinton_Before_And_After

Moral Volcano Guest-Edits Al-Qaeda’s Inspire Magazine For The CIA

The US government has published a PDF e-zine named Inspire. On TV news channels and other places, US government “experts” are claiming this PDF magazine is the online voice of the Al Qaeda underground.

FUNNY-PAGE-PDF-Al-Qaeda-Inspire-Magazine

Why do I think that this PDF was published by the US government? Because the magazine has provided Hotmail, Gmail, and Yahoo contact addresses to which aspiring terrorists or sympathisers can send stinging “Letter to the editor” email! It is pretty obvious that this is a dumb honeypot program, designed to attract only the most naive terrorists! The American people are so gullible that the will let their government put so many lives at risk for so little.

SCREENSHOT-Al-Qaeda-Contact-Addresses-From-Inspire-Magazine

Of late, there has been a rash of “terrorist plots” that the American FBI has taken credit for foiling or uncovering. (New York Times; Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.; 28 April 2012). However, all of these terrorist plots were hatched only in the minds of FBI personnel and then foist on innocent dupes, usually Muslim. (Guardian; Fake terror plots, paid informants: the tactics of FBI ‘entrapment’ questioned; 16 November 2011; http://is.gd/E1gPeM)

WEBPAGE_NYT_FBI_Foils_Own_Terrorist_Plots