For armed policemen waited rather than confront the Florida school shooter
Inside the US, the FBI meanwhile protects terrorists from local law enforcement.
US military fights wars for the sake of fighting war, not to win anything. US government funds the Taliban for protection of road convoys and then once in Afghanistan fights the Taliban. For their part, the Taliban are only too happy to kill the Americans using weapons bought with their own money.
All terrorism is state-sponsored terrorism. Whatever be the justification used.
It has become an out-of-control situation – not of terrorists but of intelligence agencies.
Obama’s Justice Department justified the risks of giving weapons to the Sinola drug cartel and Syrian, Libyan terrorist groups. Bush administration gave weapons to Afghan groups including the purposely created Taliban groups. George Bush Sr. & Regan gave weapons to right wing terrorist groups all over Latin America. Carter government armed the Afghan Mujahideen.
They all come back attack America. US government helps thing along by giving visas & permanent residence to the hotheads.
American public has no memory. The Press is in bed with the CIA. Members of legislature are under surveillance and blackmail. No wonder there is no end to terror. The enemy is within the government. It’s the CIA.
In the news – Republic operative who was looking for Clinton email allegedly found to have committed suicide.
Obama said TTIP and TPP will allow “United States to set the rules of international trade.” At the same time, his administration hid the rules from members of US Congress. So, who was setting the rules? Certainly not his administration. Transnational companies, not necessarily American ones, were writing the rules. Somehow, America was writing the rules while its elected representatives had no say in it. All the pre-draft negotiations were conducted in secret.
The US-led treaties did not include China. China for its part had started RCEP. Despite that, all of these treaties had the same goals:
- Wholesale elimination/reduction of import duties over and above what WTO 1.0 required.
- Enriching transnational companies.
- Usurpation of the jurisdiction of courts and national legislatures.
- Tax-payer funded payouts from national budgets to aggrieved MNCs decided by arbitration courts.
Decades of free trade with China has destroyed vast swathes of manufacturing in the industrialized world.
This was going to be taken further with these so-called regional treaties. Some exclusivity was added to make it appear alluring like forbidden fruit.
After MNCs have covered various regions of the world with such treaties, WTO secretariat can be expected ask the regions to stop fighting with each other and come together again under a common WTO 2.0 framework. This is how it is going to be, I bet.
With WTO 1.0, the GATT negotiations took decades to get all countries on board. For WTO 2.0, they are taking chunks out of the whole and getting it passed by different groups.
Ultimately, everything will fit into place. At least that’s what they hoped for. Unfortunately, Trump has withdrawn the US from TTIP & TPP.
But this is a longterm project. It will in all likelihood outlast Trump. These internationalists are like cockroaches.
Of course, our economies will be totally destroyed before WTO 2.0 comes into place. Our parliaments and courts will be unable to help us. MNCs will have set up leins on tax revenues.
WTO 2.0 would then be offered as the solution of the problem it helped created. This is a tried-and-tested technique of the globalists. The solution is the problem and vice-versa.
In India, there has been no awareness of TTIP, TTP or RCEP. Ministry of Commerce is conducting negotiations with other RCEP members. They realize the dangers of free trade with China but are unlikely exit the grouping because of pressure from PMO. Modi, the traitor, is all for RCEP.
Nobody in the Parliament is opposing it. No party has taken a position against it. When the deal is signed, the media will read about it in Wikipedia and blabber something as if they knew about it all along.
“Yes, we will investigate if Russia had inappropriate contacts with Trump team. Hillary Clinton’s private server was… …only carelessness. We let her lawyers delete emails & smash her Blackberry devices. But, there was no criminal intent. So, I pronounce her Not Guilty!”
E. Howard scribbled the initials “LBJ,” standing for Kennedy’s ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under “LBJ,” connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that’s never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer’s name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer’s name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales’ name, with a line, the framed words “French Gunman Grassy Knoll.”
So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that’s the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t the only shooter in Dallas.
Why demonize an obscure joker? As Mao Zedong said, reactionaries are paper tigers. They thrive on others’ attention.
Unlike Christians, Indian Muslims do not engage in proselytization. The many “Hindu-Muslim riots” have convinced them that they both should go their separate ways as far as religion goes and proselytization would put them in direct conflict with each other. The only Indian Muslim groups to engage in religious conversion are those financed by Saudis. The “Saudis”, as distinct from Arabians and Arabs, are not Muslims. And, Arabia is not “Saudi.”
Like the Bahaism in Iran, Saudi Wahhabism was invented by British Petroleum (Anglo-American Oil). With discovery of oil and the realization of its strategic value, the British financed the House of Saud, provided them with lots of weapons and took over Arabia from the Ottoman Empire. That was how Arabia became Saudi Arabia. There are doubts whether Saudi royal family is even Muslim. (https://www.scribd.com/document/98042289/Saudi-Royal-Family-Could-Be-Jewish) Many Islamic scholars and historians, including Saddam Hussein’s government, have published material raising doubts in this regard. (https://blogs.harvard.edu/mesh/2008/03/anti_wahhabism_a_footnote/) This can be ascertained by the fact that the Saudis have destroyed many monuments associated with Prophet and his family and have converted those sites into royal palaces, hotels, parking lots and toilets. They have been bankrolling the spread of a virulent intolerant brand of Islam, known as Wahhabism, all over the world. Claiming to be Islamic fundamentalists, Wahhabis have laid to waste many great Muslim cultures.
As most Indian Muslim organizations are not keen on proselytization (as sought by the Wahhabis), Zakir Naik’s mission has been to radicalize Indian Muslims. For several years, this harmless joker has been making a fool of himself on television. So long as Saudi money was flowing, the halls were full. In these assemblies, he not only embarrassed his fellow Muslims but also attacked other religions. The Christian faith has been his favourite punching bag, as they are an even lesser minority than Muslims.
In one of his “debates”, Naik taunted a Christian preacher to drink poison if he believed Jesus was the real savior. The preacher quoted the Bible and said “Thou shall not tempt the Lord”, and left the the circus. It goes without saying that Zakir Naik did not himself drink the poison to affirm his own faith.
So, that’s how things were standing – down in the dumps – for Naik. That is, until recently, when US embassy officials asked Indian intelligence agencies to put some good words with their “terrorists” in Bangladesh. Oh, yes, it was their terrorists. The biggest CIA station in India is in Calcutta. In 2013, the American ambassador in Libya was kidnapped from a secret CIA base and murdered by Libyan terrorists who were working for Allied forces. To cover that up, Hillary Clinton’s Department of State arranged an already existing video to be hastily overdubbed with fake anti-Islamic dialogues and made it available on YouTube. And, as if on cue, “protests” by Islamists occurred in Egypt and in Kashmir, Calcutta and Bangladesh. Who arranged these protests? Even though Google subsequently restricted access to the anti-Islamic video in countries with huge Muslim populations, Google did not entirely remove the video from YouTube, as they needed continue to provide Hillary and her State department with its fig-leaf cover for the brutal killing. Even though video continues to be online, no Islamic group is now protesting it. Google continues to do business in Muslim countries.
Now, Modi government is all set to rain down on him like a ton of bricks and demonize another faker as per US State Department’s plans. What a bunch of morons we have to deal with!
Today, we live in a state where foreign agencies like the FBI can order Indian citizens to be secretly executed. Indian intelligence blindly believer everything Americans or the British say. Hence, they arranged an encounter killing in which an innocent woman named Ishrat Jehan was also brutally killed in cold blood. When CBI was investigating the fake encounter (under the Congress regime), the home secretary washed off his hands over the entire affair.
After Modi’s appointment as PM and his own golden parachute post-retirement at Adani’s, GK Pillai is singing a different tune. In a TV interview, GK Pillai confessed that Home Ministry officials were in the business of approving extra-judicial killings recommended by intelligence agencies. He also said that intelligence agencies all over the world operate outside the law and democratic governments should not question their decisions. Further, he said he would not shirk from committing perjury or asking law officials to perjure themselves if required by intelligence outfits. Despite this confession, no Islamic group is protesting. As India Today recently exposed, both Hindu and Islamic groups engage in protests and riots on a rent-a-crowd basis. (http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/uttar-pradesh-assembly-elections-rent-a-riot/1/701955.html)
We enticed the LeT operatives to come to India and target PM Narendra Modi (then Gujarat CM) and we laid a trap and killed them… IB had enticed and trapped them and then targeted them. We used a source who they (LeT) thought was their source. It is always better to know your enemy as he is coming in rather than wait for him to plan an operation on his own without our knowledge. Our source had in fact told that ‘look if you come in you can target Modi and other high profile people’ and the LeT decided to come in… CBI had indulged in leaks. They should have exercised extreme discretion. If I was the home secretary, I would have called the director CBI and said look this is unacceptable. I personally would have not recommended a CBI probe into this case… Ishrat was a cover. This was an intel operation involving the LeT. If it was an intel operation, then you should not talk about fake encounter. We should make that distinction. We can’t mix up the two. Ishrat knew that something was wrong. An unmarried Muslim girl went with a married person, spent nights with him as husband and wife. She was a cover for them… It’s true that morale came down of the IB. IB operations are not strictly within the ambit of the law. That’s how it is all around the world.
IB is staffed by police officials on deputation. Like all good Indian policemen, they are easily susceptible by bribes, which are generously provided by the US embassy. FBI’s basis for their accusation of Ishrat was the DEA/ISI double agent David Headley. Headly scouted for locations for 26-11 attacks in Bombay but remains in house arrest (supposedly) under a plea bargain with the US Justice Department. For obvious reasons, FBI did not to arrest Headley even though his wife had complained to the US government about his terrorist links.
Update: The photo of Hillary Clinton holding the head of Liz Warren was copied in an extremely repugnant manner by a comic named Kathy Griffin.