Tagged: hormone disrupting chemicals

TransGenderism is GENDER APPROPRIATION! Gender Diversity is Gender Denial

Use reptilian techniques against reptilians. Anyone who does not agree is in Gender Denial.

Cross-dressers & eunuchs are using anti-discrimination laws and new rule changes to adopt children; invade designated areas such as girls’/women’s bathrooms; harass women-to-women businesses; and compete against  female athletes in sports.

Gender diversity propaganda

If “Cultural Appropriation” is a real thing, then so is GENDER APPROPRIATION!

In 2014, a “trans” male MMA fighter broke the skull of a female opponent.

In Canada, a “trans” man is suing a female beautician for refusing to provide genital waxing services (a procedure to remove groin hair prior to swimming or sunbathing) despite possessing male organs.

Recently, a male cyclist won against female athletes and has become self-appointed spokesman for “trans” athletes (shemales) who are now competing against normal women. Famous tennis player Martina Navratilova (a lesbian) spoke against this in a Twitter message. It caused a backlash against her from the “trans” community and the lefties. Navratilova, thinking she must have made some mistake, rescinded here views and offered to read up more on the subject. Unlike others who went through that rabbit hole, Martina (God bless her soul) came back in support of the poor women who had to lose against that she-man.

To put my argument at its most basic: a man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organisation, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to making babies. It’s insane and it’s cheating.


Screw Angelina Jolie’s Breasts! Keep Your Boobs On, Ladies!

Don’t be brainwashed by a brainwashed CIA butterrfly (See Project Monarch)


The media is agog with the news that Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie had had a double mastectomy, as a preventive measure against breast cancer.

It looks like Angelina Jolie had cancer and then decided to make the best of it – engage in a media campaign for the cancer industry. They are now driving gullible women in to making multiple visits to oncologists and performing expensive tests including biopsies, CTs, and mammographs. They will also be spending a huge part of their income on drugs, even though they don’t have cancer. This is because US government recently decided to make it legal for doctors to prescribe expensive cancer drugs “high-risk” women take, as “preventive medication”. Surely, the cancer industry is firing on all cylinders and the PR campaign accompanying it is a match.

Women should see through this charade. Angelina Jolie is a lifelong drug addict. She postponed having a kid so that she could “keep her figure.” She must have spent a fortune on contraceptives. To mask that, she adopted foreign kids – as if America has no orphans in need of a family. She had a kid when she was over 30. She must have also take milk-suppression drugs (as do most American women today) to get back into “business.”

Women in particular are more exposed to cancer-inducing chemicals – makeup, contraceptives, drugs, vaccines, processed food,…. The WHO has published a report titled “State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals – 2012” and take evasive measures. Taking cancer drugs or removing their breasts is not the solution.

Making people take medicines for diseases they don’t have and getting them take up mutilating surgical procedures is the new high-growth maximum-returns business venture for the ever-greedy medical industry. Like vaccines, these purveyors of “health” need not prove their efforts work. The jacked-up prices are an indicator that governments will be asked to bankroll the medical industry’s blockbuster business. The editorial written by Ms. Jolie provides an indicator what is in store for the taxpayer.

Breast cancer alone kills some 458,000 people each year, according to the World Health Organization, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. It has got to be a priority to ensure that more women can access gene testing and lifesaving preventive treatment, whatever their means and background, wherever they live. The cost of testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, at more than $3,000 in the United States, remains an obstacle for many women.

This charade is a repeat of the “expensive vaccine” business plan adopted by the makers of HPV. The numbers quoted for HPV and breast cancer are very low compared to causualties caused by major diseases such as infant mortality, malaria, tuberculosis and typhoid. Governments need not fight malnutrition, lack of supply of clean water and food, and lack of hygienic dwellings. They need to spend their money on whatever the medical industry has products for at the moment. If it is HPV, then that is the big problem now. If it is breast cancer screening, then that is what governments should be worried about.

Anjelina Jolie Breasts Survive

No, Angelina Jolie’s breasts were not removed. Only “parts” from the inside were removed.

If anyone objects to the state paying for these expensive medicines and procedures, then of course they will be branded as “anti-women” or worse “anti-science.” The medical industry pays off health officials so that the vaccines are expeditiously and unquestioningly approved. They pay off politicians so that the vaccines are made mandatory and the state pays the bill. They pay off legislators so that the manufacturers are freed from liability mandated by laws in the book. They pay off doctors if they write an op-ed or appear on TV promoting the plan. They pay off journalists and media houses so that the gullible public themselves demands them. All of this costs money. That is why all prices are jacked up.

UPDATE (23 May 2013): I thought mastectomy meant that both jugs got removed. Ms. Jolie says she only got some *parts* removed from the inside, not the entire piece, as some unfortunate women are forced to do. All of these images that I created are obsolete now.

Apparently, it was no different from a boob job. Brad Pitt must indeed be a happy man now. Now, if he was high risk for anal cancer or testicular cancer, would he maim himself in a similar manner? Or, was all this a charade? A pre-emptive PR campaign to prepare the slaves for the impending US Supreme Court decision that gene patents are valid? The NYT editorial was closely accompanied by cover stories on both Time and People magazines.

Apparently, the judges were worried of the public backlash. Any idiot can be an US SC judge. You just need to know the president or the people who appointed him. No prior bar practice either as a judge or as an advocate is necessary. This is why America’s transformation into a Fascist state is a surety.