Despite numerous reports of adverse effects of HPV vaccines and the unauthorized clinical trials on tribal people, the AAP government is now giving HPV vaccines to all girls. This shows that despite being permanently hooked up to Twitter and Facebook, he doesn’t get proper information before taking an important decision.
The HPV makers are giving the vaccines to the Delhi government at a subsidized rate because they can on the long-term get market prices when governments to make it mandatory. In the US, many state legislatures have already given immunity to the manufacturers against vaccine injury lawsuits before making the vaccines mandatory (event against parental consent). The Bill Gates-promoted Path.org has been asked to stop its illegal clinical trials in government hostels run for tribal girls.
Even in the US where sexual promiscuity is high among teens, the HPV was considered unnecessary. It was originally meant for prostitutes and other high-risk people but greedy vaccine makers pitched it to all girls in the population. They have become so greedy that they managed to get the vaccine given to boys as well! Cervical cancer is not a big killer but since the manufacturers have a vaccine they want it to be sold at a premium and be made mandatory. Given the phenomenal profits coming from the vaccine sales, politicians and health official and doctors find it impossible to say no to the vaccine manufacturers.
US talk show host Katie Couric brought HPV vaccine injury cases to limelight and her website was inundated with numerous heart-wrenching stories from parents who have had their daughters lives ruined by the vaccines.
Everything you need to build a small cottage in the woods.
In 2008 UK court case, Proctor & Gamble (P&G) claimed that its famous Pringles chips were not really potato chips. Of course, to avoid taxes. They buttressed this claim with the list of ingredients, which showed that it was less than 50% potato and rest of it was just flour/starch and other malcontents. Pringles was already notorious for its use of the addictive MSG (Mono-sodium glutamate) or ajinomoto.
As if that was not enough, the additives in a box of Pringles deserves special attention. The Codex Alimentarius created by the United Nations has made it easy to hide the true nature of the ingredients. Fortunately, I have with me an old edition of Maurice Hanssen’s E for Additives. I looked up the additives in the book and it seems like a box of Pringles contains certain unpalatable additives designed to freak out anyone. Although they are in small quantities, you wouldn’t encounter them if you simply bought a fresh bag of regular chips instead.
- Anti-caking agent: INS 551 is silicon dioxide. Otherwise known as sand.
- Flavour enhancers: INS 627 is sodium guanlyate, which is synthetically manufactured. INS 631 is sodium inosinate, which is a non-vegetarian additive extracted from meat and sardines (a fish). Both are not good for babies or young children or those suffering from gout.
- Preservative: INS 220 is sulfur dioxide. Toxic to fungi. Made from sulfur or gypsum combustion. Destroys vitamin E and irritates alimentary canal.
- Emulsifier: INS 414 is Gum Arabic, popularly used in painting water colors. It is the hardened sap tapped from the bark of an African tree.
It took several decades for the US government to accept a link between tobacco and cancer. It will take many more decades to prove the link between wireless radiation and cancer. Unfortunately, by then, human civilization would have gone past Idiocracy (the movie) state and reached the Planet of the Apes state.
US government will go to war on a mere suspicion that the leader of some oil-rich country is harboring thoughts of acquiring nuclear weapons. Citing non-existent terrorists, they will ask citizens in their country and outside to give up their rights for the “greater common good.” But, when scientific studies suggest a possible health risk to the population, they prefer to look away.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the US government had formed the National Toxicology Program (NTP) to conduct a large-scale study on the link between cancer and mobile phone radiation. The preliminary results indicate that there may be a risk of cancer for phone radiation. Scientific American says:
The researchers found that as the thousands of rats in the new study were exposed to greater intensities of RF radiation, more of them developed rare forms of brain and heart cancer that could not be easily explained away, exhibiting a direct dose–response relationship. Overall, the incidence of these rare tumors was still relatively low, which would be expected with rare tumors in general, but the incidence grew with greater levels of exposure to the radiation. Some of the rats had glioma—a tumor of the glial cells in the brain—or schwannoma of the heart. Furthering concern about the findings: In prior epidemiological studies of humans and cell phone exposure, both types of tumors have also cropped up as associations.
In contrast, none of the control rats—those not exposed to the radiation—developed such tumors. But complicating matters was the fact that the findings were mixed across sexes: More such lesions were found in male rats than in female rats. The tumors in the male rats “are considered likely the result of whole-body exposure” to this radiation, the study authors wrote. And the data suggests the relationship was strongest between the RF exposure and the lesions in the heart, rather than the brain: Cardiac schwannomas were observed in male rats at all exposed groups, the authors note. But no “biologically significant effects were observed in the brain or heart of female rats regardless of modulation.” Based on these findings, Portier said that this is not just an associated finding—but that the relationship between radiation exposure and cancer is clear. “I would call it a causative study, absolutely. They controlled everything in the study. It’s [the cancer] because of the exposure.”
– Major Cell Phone Radiation Study Reignites Cancer Questions; 27 May 2016; http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/
Even before the news trickled out, the media has been flooded with articles asking people not to freak out. They are also muddying the debate by taking cheap shots at sellers of radiation shields and other such products.
The industry propagandists hide their affiliation by adding a non-disclaimer disclaimer to the article – “Views expressed in this article are personal.” Apart from them, there are sellouts from the medical/scientific profession who have been encouraged write articles and even maintain entire websites and blogs to propagate the idea that cell phone radiation is safe. All of them cite prestigious organizations such as WHO and Mayo Clinic as having cleared cell phone radiation. Unfortunately, most “studies” are just surveys made on other studies. The original studies have serious limitations and/or are not conclusive enough.
The World Health Organization (WHO) formed International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to study the issue. IARC designated that cell phone radiation was possibly carcinogenic. Possibly under pressure from telecoms, WHO later announced that there is no link. It currently has a study to be released this year that will conclusively prove/disprove the link.
The propagandists are not above making false statements or making wrong conclusions. This hack from Business Insider says that rats were exposed to radiation levels that do not correspond to those exposed to humans. With all the Wi-Fi and mobile data (2G/3G/4G/5G) networks connecting all the apps (that report back to home base all the time), Bluetooth devices, smart watches and bands including the hyped-up Internet of Things (IoT) coupled with the equally hyped-up Big Data, the rats would have got comparatively less radiation. One of the most abominable views espoused by them is that the mobile phone waves, which can pass through buildings and underground, cannot get below the skin!
If it is 100% sure that there is no risk of cancer for wireless radiation sources, then why do government websites still carry precautionary measures against cancer. These pages should be removed.
Scientists and doctors are having a tough time with demands to provide unassailable “SCIENCE-BASED” conclusions. For now, they are citing studies that show no link while advising people to take precautions. Propagandists meanwhile will laugh all the way to bank.
World Health Organization doesn’t care if women have miscarriages or pass-on HCG anti-gen to their children. There is no humanity in them and in future… literally everywhere!
When the HCG antigen was discovered in WHO vaccines, it was not known that this would be done deliberately and so covertly. William Engdahl writes:
The idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World is also not new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved as early as 1972 in a major project together with WHO and others to perfect another “new vaccine.”
The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990’s. The WHO oversaw massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion. Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones came from the Philippines and Nicaragua.
Read more about the Kenya vaccine issue on Kenya Today website. The Catholic organization are not vaccine opponents. They in fact give out more vaccines than the government.
The anti-vaccine canard linking MMR and autism has been buried, right? (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/an-early-cure-for-parents-vaccine-panic/2011/06/08/AGzM5MPH_story.html)
Well, it refuses to stay dead and has come back as zombie! A whistleblower at CDC, Atlanta, has gone on record about evidence found by the CDC linking autism and MMR in a study involving black American children. (See his statement on his attorneys’ website http://www.morganverkamp.com/august-27-2014-press-release-statement-of-william-w-thompson-ph-d-regarding-the-2004-article-examining-the-possibility-of-a-relationship-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/)
The study’s conclusion was buried and “scientists” published cherry-picked statistics. Big Pharma, for their part, unleashed a massive publicity campaign that claimed that the canard has been finally buried. When so many people are saying that it can’t be false, right?
Now, Mike Adams at Natural News was one of the first people who got wind of the whistleblower’s moves. He recently published a video:
In China and US now
- Parts of Chinese city sealed after man dies of bubonic plague http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-18/four-cases-of-life-threatening-plague-found-in-colorado.html
- Four Cases of Life-Threatening Plague Found in Colorado (http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/parts-of-chinese-city-sealed-after-man-dies-of-bubonic-plague/article6240806.ece)
Here is the Rockefeller Foundation paper imagining a global pandemic scenario – “Scenarios
for the Future of Technology and International Development”
Nepalis consume raw milk. They don’t take allopathic medicine. They don’t vaccinate, drink piped fluoridated or chlorinated water… so on. They eat naturally grown food without chemicals ir pesticides. Their homes are made from natural material.
This is why they don’t have cancer. They are the only few people who have enzymes that can digest milk protein. They get married very young (14-16) and have high fertility rates. Women give birth at home. Women work even on the day of delivery and go back to work almost immediately.
Women carry unbelievably huge weights on their backs, as Desmond Doig recounts in his book. Like wrestlers, they take adequate precautions by tieing a cloth belt around their belly.
So, yes, fallen wombs may be a problem but not as much as this news report suggests.
What the Rockefellers are looking at is not helping the women. They want to make permanent changes to their lifestyle. Make them less fertile and transform them into permanent customers of their drug/medical industries, processed food businesses and piped (poisoned) water supply companies.
Global elite are at the forefront of fighting climate change. They should set an example themselves first before asking others to make sacrifices.
1. Don’t live in big luxury homes – Choose Hong Kong-style one-room apartments
Big houses consume more energy. They also trap more sunlight and contribute to global warming. Live in one-room apartments in clustered high-rise apartments, as in Hong Kong, Shanghai or Beijing.
2. No private planes – Travel economy on commercial passenger airlines – Or, better, choose trains & buses!
Private planes contribute to global warming. Private luxury jets, in particular, are extremely wasteful and polluting. If you have to travel by air, then choose scheduled economy-class flights on commercial airlines. Prefer mass transport options such as trains or buses. Walk if necessary. Don’t use cars. If you use electric cars, you still are expending fossil fuels at the thermal power plants.
3. You should have no children – If you have any, kill them – It is the ethical thing to do!
Expanding global population threatens the future of our planet. In order to encourage others, you should stop producing children. If you already have children, then kill them. Post-birth abortions are supposedly ethical. This idea was floated on BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics.
4. Vaccinate your children, often – Enroll your entire tribe in vaccine trials – Use force if necessary
Your vaccine propaganda has included claims that an infant could safely take up to 1,00,000 hundred vaccines (Paul Offit, October 2005; Parents’ Pack newsletter; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia). You should set an example to others by giving all those vaccines to your kids in public. There should be weekly elite vaccination camps.
All elites should be mandatorily enrolled in vaccine trials and experimental drugs. Drugs/vaccines proven safe after extensive testing on your crowd should only be released for general use.
Elites should be administered experimental vaccines by force if necessary.
Vaccinated populations seem to show high incidence of cancer, hypertension, and other diseases. Fertility rates are also decreasing among vaccinated populations. Many of them are turning homosexual or discovering alternative lifestyles that does not involve baby-making. Less population means less climate change. Go for it!
5. Eat less – Eat mass-produced plastic food made from recycled industrial waste – Eat roaches if you like non-vegetarian
We know you are gluttons. Many of you are overweight. Every meal you take at a restaurant could feed a Third-world family for a year. You should eat less. Preferably plastic food from McDonalds.
Eat trees if you are the type that seeks to be one with the Universe. MacDonald’s
saw dust cellulouse may look appealing to you.
6. Stop polluting the environment – Buy pollution control equipment – Use modern technologies
You own most of the world’s biggest polluters – factories, mines, etc. You cause most pollution. How about reducing that? How about installing pollution control equipment with your own money? Or using modern technologies that mitigate/avoid pollution?
7. Stop destroying forests and farmlands – Don’t throw economic hitmen on nations – Don’t threaten/attack/rape/kill/bribe!
You are acquiring forests and farmlands from poor people in Third World countries. How about stopping that? You are also hiring economic hitmen and thugs to drive out farmers and forest dwellers. You are bribing government officials, police and military. You are also overthrowing governments, politicians and anyone in your path. Stop that.
8. Stop hiding your income – Repatriate funds hidden abroad – Pay your fair share of taxes!
Individuals pay tax on their total income. Corporations pay tax only on profit before tax. You put all your expenses on the books of your companies, trusts and other cutouts and you pay little income tax. In fact, many of you show notional losses to pay no tax or even demand refunds from past payments. Even the profits generated by companies are held in tax havens abroad and are never repatriated. If you pay your fair share of taxes, it will help governments fund efforts to save the environment.
9. Contribute to save the environment – Pay Elite Carbon Tax – Carbon tax exclusively for elites!
Carbon tax should be exclusive for the elite. You own most of the wealth. Then, you should pay carbon tax, not the slaves. Carbon tax should be a top-down affair, affecting owners of polluting industries such as oil companies and miners, not consumers.
10. Give green technologies a chance – Don’t co-opt them and make them financially unviable
You control the banks and the lending. Your advisers mandate what technologies to choose and what equipment to buy. This increase the capital cost of implementing green technologies and makes them seem unviable.